Temporary Trade Truce Gives Markets Breathing Room, but Not Certainty


A fragile thaw in US–China tensions has added a modest tailwind to risk assets, offering relief to equities tied to global trade and to US agriculture. The policy channel runs through tariffs and supply chains, and the immediate opportunity sits in cyclicals and commodity exporters. Yet the structure of the agreement, which renews annually, keeps volatility risk alive.

Washington’s decision to cut fentanyl-linked tariffs from 20% to 10% unlocked reciprocal steps from Beijing, including a pause on rare-earth export controls and renewed purchases of U.S. soybeans. The deal matters because trade between the two countries totaled roughly $580 billion in 2024, and each policy turn sends waves across global supply chains.

This détente follows months of escalation, including Beijing’s restrictions on critical minerals and its pullback from U.S. agriculture, a pressure point for the White House given farmers’ political relevance. A face-to-face meeting between President Trump and President Xi helped catalyze progress. The symbolism matters, but the structure remains tactical, not permanent: the rare-earth suspension runs for one year, and Beijing’s soybean pledge is tied explicitly to market prices.

Macro context amplifies the stakes. The U.S. economy continues to grow at a moderate pace, with the Federal Reserve signaling patience before while inflation trends lower. China faces sub-trend growth and a still-fragile property sector, making export stability important.

Both sides have incentives to buy time, not to reset the relationship. Markets know this. The truce reduces near-term geopolitical risk premiums but does not eliminate them, particularly across semiconductor supply chains and critical minerals, where strategic competition remains intense.

Risk appetite improved modestly on the headlines. On the day of the announcement, the gained roughly 0.4% intraday before settling closer to 0.3% at the close, led by industrials and materials, while U.S. farm-equipment names also outperformed.

The rose about 0.5% intraday but faded as long-duration tech remains sensitive to rates more than trade headlines. 10-year Treasury yields slipped by about 3 basis points to hover near recent lows as traders dialed down a risk-off bid. 2-year yields eased by about 2 basis points, maintaining a mild flattening bias as the Fed remains data-dependent.

In FX, the yuan firmed modestly with dipping roughly 50 pips intraday, reflecting reduced trade-war anxiety. The dollar index was little changed, although commodity-linked currencies saw minor support. Soybean futures bounced by roughly 1% intraday, reflecting relief but also acknowledging China’s caveat.

The “market price” language gives Beijing flexibility to shift back toward cheaper Brazilian supply later in the winter. Brazil’s harvest, expected in February, could again pressure U.S. farmers and cap upside. Rare-earth equities in Asia and Europe saw small gains, while U.S. defense names edged higher as supply-chain risks eased. Volatility softened: front-month equity VIX dipped toward 13, still low by historical standards.

The base case is a managed calm through the next few weeks, with markets trading a modest risk-on bias as long as economic data stay stable and neither side re-escalates. Key markers include U.S. export data, USDA weekly sales, China customs flows, and policy commentary ahead of the next Fed meeting.

If China expands agricultural purchases before year-end and rare-earth shipments normalize, cyclicals and commodity producers should hold their bid. In that environment, equities could grind higher into year-end, Treasury yields stay range-bound, and the yuan holds recent gains.

The alternative case sees cracks reappear quickly. Should February Brazilian supply undercut U.S. soybeans, or if technology-related controls resurface, the détente could unwind. Any hawkish Fed surprise, especially if stalls, would amplify pressure. Under this scenario, commodity futures would soften, USD/CNY would drift higher again, and equities tied to global trade would lag. Semiconductors and defense would likely outperform on strategic hedging flows, while volatility would pick up in spring.

For investors, the message is to treat this as a tactical window, not a strategic regime shift. The opportunity sits in selective cyclicals and agriculture-linked names, but sizing should reflect geopolitical tail risk. The key risk is that Brazil’s crop quickly displaces U.S. export volumes, testing Washington’s political calculus.

Stay nimble: maintain exposure to beneficiaries of trade calm, keep quality defensives funded, and be ready to rotate if data or policy rhetoric shifts. A durable easing in U.S.–China friction would warrant a fuller risk allocation, but until the annual renewal cycle proves credible, prudence and flexibility remain the right portfolio stance.





Source link